|
Conventional lining
- silica dust exposure to workers was very difficult to control
and commonly exceeded permissible exposure levels set by health
and safety regulations. Furthermore, legislation was and continues
to tighten; recently the International Agency for Research on
Cancer reclassified overexposure to inhaled crystalline silica
from occupational sources as carcinogenic.
- the lining procedure was strenuous and labour intensive. Workers
were at risk of compensable injury in particular the lower back
from lifting many bags of refractory and repetitive strain injury
arising from manual deaeration or forking the material.
- worker fatigue in hazardous working conditions and human variabilities
contributed to inconsistencies in material distribution and density
of the lining. This contributed to unpredictable lining life and
production schedules from one rebuild to the next.
- conventional methods inadequately vibrated material in the tapered
section that can contribute to premature wear and failure.
Necessity became the mother of invention. As pressure from the
union, health and safety association, and supervisors intensified,
finding a solution to deplorable working conditions and lining inconsistencies
became paramount. Following an extensive ergonomic study of the
existing problems, Ayton, "A.J." developed crude sketches of
a machine to line the furnace automatically that he believed would
provide a solution. The machine was fabricated, and a pilot project
began 1987.
The primary motivation was to remove workers from hazardous conditions
associated with manually lining a furnace with silica. This was
successfully accomplished with respirable silica dust test results
measuring below OSHA's permissible exposure levels. Unexpected benefits
followed. It was found that an additional 600 pounds of material
was added to the furnace sidewalls using the refractory installation
machine. As a result, the increased density yielded 33 percent longer
lining life. Hours of labour to line the furnace was reduced 68
percent as was the number of workers required to line the furnaces
when compared with former conventional methods.
|